Catherine’s Case Study
Mothers At Home Matter Mothers At Home Matter

Catherine’s Case Study

We are looking for case studies to show just how hard it is for families and to highlight the challenges faced by those wanting to care at home. Catherine, one of our members, has kindly put forward her story in the hope that by changing how we support families other mothers will not have to suffer in the same way.

Read More
Tax Reforms Needed
Andinic Andinic

Tax Reforms Needed

Reform of the tax system is needed to help ‘hard-working families’, writes Mothers At Home Matter’s chair, Anne Fennell. Families are struggling. They face an unprecedented rise in fuel and energy costs in the realm of £2k a year but do not have the means of meeting this. Many of the problems families face arise from a tax system which far from helping them does not even recognise them and whilst it elevates the individual it creates the problems which will see families pushed further into poverty. 

Read More
The Gap
Mothers At Home Matter Mothers At Home Matter

The Gap

Sally Greenhill reports on the webinar ‘Family: The Gap between Westminster and the rest.’ Organised by the Centre for Social Justice, it was chaired by Christine Odone and opened by Gavin Williamson MP.

Read More
Treasury Select Committee
Mothers At Home Matter Mothers At Home Matter

Treasury Select Committee

MAHM’s contribution to the Treasury Select Committee’s ‘Tax after Coronavirus’ inquiry presented evidence to address the question: ‘Which areas of the tax system are most in need of reform?’

We focused specifically on income tax emphasising the pressing need for a fairer family taxation system. Our system of independent taxation is not fit for purpose for taxing families; it causes unfairness, injustice and even harm.

Read More
Early Years Commission
Mothers At Home Matter Mothers At Home Matter

Early Years Commission

We were invited to submit our research evidence to the independent, cross-party Early Years Commission to build a consensus on the future of early years policy.

They stated that they would ‘draw on evidence’ but their focus was ‘on establishing consensus’ on existing proposed solutions. Our submission challenged current orthodoxy by stating that the optimum carer for a young child is its mother.

Read More